The original concept of marriage as most people believe, comes from the Christian Bible, and that holy union is to be between a man and a woman, who are marrying to create new life and continue on for generations and generations. Same-sex marriage bans did not violate the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause because marriage is a state issue, at least until this supreme court decision was finalized it was up to the state and its residents to decide if they wanted to allow gay marriage. We cannot be changing the constitution, as the laws and specifics of marriage have been spelled out perfectly clear, and if we continue to keep changing history as it was written that will induce complete anarchy.
Pretty much everything I said in the second paragraph was completely painful to type out, it baffles me that people still in 2015 are intolerant of gay people. Homosexuality is present in every species and is seen as a completely natural thing, where homophobia only exists in one species; human. We must stop the intolerance and stop all of the hate that will get us nowhere. Everyone's love deserves to be validated and love between two men or two women is no different, that that of a man and a woman. It doesn't matter if your religion is against it or if your personal values disagree with this decision. Same sex marriage is legal in every state now and there isn't a thing anyone can do to prevent two people from marrying each other based on their sex. This case ruling is incredibly important and helps show how we are becoming a more progressive nation.
Bridget,
ReplyDeleteVery impassioned argument in support of gay marriage. I really like your last two sentences in your intro - great thesis stuff there - as you make a strong statement that the rest of your blog follows.
The facts and figures that you sprinkle throughout your introduction are great - they are the researched part of your post. Unfortunately, those facts and that research didn't trickle down into the other paragraphs as equally. You need to do that to prove that you are an "expert" on this topic.
For instance - in your passionate conclusion - if you could just find some statistics about how gay marriage has not destroyed society (maybe facts about gay parents?), then you'd have indisputable evidence that your thesis is indeed correct and the most convincing.
But your current conclusion just has more opinion - albeit impassioned - than fact. See if you can infuse some more facts in there, so that your readers are convinced and educated by your post.
Also, you forgot to include pictures. Be sure to catch your readers attention, and enhance your design, with images that relate to your theme/debate.
GR: 78